Press "Enter" to skip to content

Bigotry

Got a bitterly amusing voice mail last night. It was forwarded to me as an MP3 file by Rich Lucibella, publisher of S.W.A.T. magazine (for which, oddly enough, I write; Rich and editor Denny Hansen are terrific people).

Anyhow, my latest S.W.A.T. article is called “Proudly Redneck.” It points out that in this veddy, veddy PC age, the one group it’s still socially acceptable to stereotype is “rednecks” — crackers, rubes, hayseeds. You know, us country folk.

The article opens with eight bad old racial or ethnic slurs that no polite person uses these days and goes on to ask why, if those words make us cringe, “redneck” is any less cringeworthy.

Well … this voice mail claimed to be from a Chicago cop — the real deal (he went out of his way to note), not some poseur running around merely playing SWAT guy. He said he was African-American and a long-time faithful reader of the magazine.

AND, he said, that article was the most offensive thing he’d ever read. And he was going to throw the magazine into a garbage can. And he was never, ever again in his entire life going to read one word in S.W.A.T. Not ever.

“Why?” you might ask?

Because some rednecks, at some time murdered some black people.

In other words — all rednecks are all alike. They deserve to be sneeringly stereotyped, even when other groups are treated as individuals. Solely because of the actions (mostly long past actions, at that) of a few.

Yeah. Right.

The man who created that voice mail is a bigot, pure and simple. Of course, he’d deny his bigotry. He’d say, I’m sure, that he’s opposed to bigotry — that in fact, he reacted so strongly to the article because the magazine and I wrongly defended bigots.

He’s too bigoted to see those hated “rednecks” as individuals. They’re all guilty of crimes committed by a dreadful few.

In what way is that different than whites hating all blacks because some blacks commit carjackings?

—–

Another example: I lived in Wyoming when Matthew Shepard was murdered and his killers put on trial.

The murderers faced the death penalty and eventually plea-bargained their way to life sentences. (Correction: They made deals that resulted in multiple life sentences.)

But that was not enough for some people. You see, the Wyoming legislature would not (and as far as I know, never did) pass a law making Shepard’s murder a hate crime. So people from all over the country wrote furious letters to the statewide paper, the Casper Star-Tribune.

Many of these letters didn’t just damn the Wyoming courts or government, or even the nasty killer creeps. Quite often, the writers hissed that every, single person in Wyoming was an ignorant, hate-filled moron.

I specifically remember one of these loathing-loaded letters because it came from a college professor in Birmingham, Alabama.

Oh, the irony!

Anybody who is old enough to remember the civil rights movement will recall Birmingham with chills. The memory of Sheriff Bull Connor and his minions turning fire hoses, attack dogs, and even a tank against non-violent protesters forever sears the brain. Talk about hate-filled moronity!

Of course, it’s completely nuts to blame every citizen of Birmingham, past or present, for the outrages committed by Bull Connor.

But it’s pretty darned nuts for somebody from Birmingham to damn every, single human being in Wyoming — and remain arrogantly unconscious of the mud that could be slung in his own direction, simply using his own standards against him.

—–

One of the most useful distinctions anybody ever taught me was the distinction between prejudice and bigotry.

Prejudice, we all have. It’s an emotional reaction. An assumption or a set of assumptions that may be based on experience or inexperience. That group of guys standing outside the pool hall looks dangerous to us. Even though we’ve never tried them, we’re sure we’re going to hate artichokes. We dislike frilly pink things. We think Japanese people are going to be “different than us.” Guns are scary.

Bigotry is prejudice that won’t yield to reason. Bigotry is blindness. In fact, bigotry is choosing blindness over sight. Bigotry is … well, it’s when all rednecks, or all blacks or all whatever are guilty of the actions of a few. Bigotry is when guns are not only scary, but evil. Bigotry is when you not only believe in global warming or the war on terror, but you think that anybody who disagrees with you should be locked up for treason. Bigotry is when you’re an atheist who thinks all Christians are benighted idiots. And bigotry is when you’re a Christian who smugly “knows” that your God will send every one of those atheists screaming into hell while you sit up in heaven, smiling.

Bigotry is when you’re a redneck who hates all black people. And bigotry is when you’re a black person who hates all rednecks and thinks they deserve to be stereotyped when your own group should not. No difference between the two. Not one iota.

Of course, if you’re smart, you already know that. It’s amazing, though, how easy it is to see others’ bigotry and miss our own.

Bottom line: We’re never going to have freedom until we’re ready to treat individuals as individuals, to take each person and thing on its own merits.

Freedom is about individual rights, individual deeds, individual integrity, individual responsibility. It’s not about group identity. Freedom has no room to move when we cling to unjust concepts about others and refuse to let them go.

Nothing wrong with prejudice — pre-judging — as long as we’re able to give it up the moment we learn that our judgments are incorrect. But where there’s bigotry, there ain’t no freedom. Never will be.

9 Comments

  1. Dave
    Dave March 16, 2010 10:35 am

    On a related note, I’ve said many times that we will never get over the bigotry of the past (slavery, Jim Crow, etc) until we shut the fuck up about it. We all claim to want a colorblind society, but most of those who screech the loudest about it promote to exact opposite.

  2. Kevin Wilmeth
    Kevin Wilmeth March 16, 2010 11:07 am

    Brava! Back with style.

    (I certainly hope you got yourself recharged, but it’s great to have you back!)

    I think this subject also deserves the cui bono? question. Who benefits from all these groups bickering with each other? Who is the beneficiary of this massive manufactury of guilt-by-association? Who has the power to actually act upon the idea that Someone Should Do Something About Those People, with all the attendant lucrative enforcement opportunities that go with such a concept? And so: who is least incented to actually rid the world of bigotry?

    Keep in mind, the state never lost its interest in eugenics. It just put it under wraps for a little while, back in the middle 20th century when a couple of its more…ardent practitioners gave the idea a bad name (you know, that whole genocide thing and all). But, with a little time and some diligent low-level fomenting of tension and enmity between groups (face it, there are legions of people who have made a professional career out of encouraging you to distrust your neighbor), now we have The New Eugenics on the rise, except that it’s really no different than before.

    The minute anybody starts looking down on others as lesser than himself, he has ceded the point and added another line to Niemoller’s famous stanza. Liberty is either for everybody, or it is for nobody.

    The poor fool that left the voicemail obviously can’t see that. He’s playing the part of the useful idiot, judging people he’s never met with the serene confidence of the superior being.

    Must be nice, being “the real deal” and all, knowing your turn would never come up.

  3. Kent McManigal
    Kent McManigal March 16, 2010 12:10 pm

    I have been the target of “anti-redneck bigotry” for the past several days on my Examiner column, and no one who knows me has ever mistaken me for a redneck. Except my stalker can’t quite seem to decide why I deserve to be hated. My “greasy, long” hair has gotten some of the hatred, too. Funny, but none of the real rednecks I have even known had long hair, and mine is usually tangled, but not greasy.

    If you want to dive into the mess, it is here (as well as the past several columns): http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-5723-Albuquerque-Libertarian-Examiner~y2010m3d15-Overcoming-a-prejudice-better-late-than-never#comments

  4. Kevin Wilmeth
    Kevin Wilmeth March 16, 2010 1:22 pm

    To Kent’s point: this particular troll seems to have been leaking its ookiness over on to Kurt Hofmann’s column as well. (Claire, if you are not aware of Kurt’s work, it is worth checking out. The two “Gun Rights Examiners” I read every day are David Codrea and Kurt.)

    I expect to “get some on myself” before too long as well, as the, ahem, literary signature of this no-goodnik is just exactly the same as I have seen at my own Examiner column from time to time, and I’ve not resisted the temptation to say something over at both Kurt’s and Kent’s place. Whoever it is, it seems to be well-caffeinated and making the rounds.

    In the end, this really is just a troll we’re talking about here, but what’s of interest to this post is that our little fecal flinger understands perfectly how to exploit bigotry for its own amusement (by its own admission–to the extent that even that is sincere; who knows, really?–it amuses himself with this), and regularly reaches into the third-edition Bigot’s Compleat Playbook for material. Maybe there’s a hope, there, that one of us reveals ourselves to be a bigot, so that it can somehow “prove” that all its hurling of empty invective was valid after all. (Thus far Kurt and Kent have acquitted themselves well, to nobody’s surprise.) Who knows? Thus far it hasn’t at all been about substance–only about insults.

  5. ff42
    ff42 March 16, 2010 7:42 pm

    I’ve got to admit that I still have a group bigotry….. Of politicians! 😎

  6. Rural Mike
    Rural Mike March 17, 2010 12:11 am

    Well, as a rural person, I hope officer troll keeps to his big city, seems his attitudes probably fit in with that cast of characters who prefer their world made of steel and concrete.
    There really is nothing to make a person wake up to anything if they choose not to do so. Funny, some of the smartest, most interesting, and most down to earth people come from the country. If you can’t look past a hat, or an accent, or a little dirt on the jeans, then people like officer smiley just will never know what they are missing.

  7. Jackie Juntti
    Jackie Juntti March 17, 2010 9:18 am

    Claire!!!
    As always, you get to the heart of the matter and that is why I have so appreciated your writings since those many years ago that we met. I have held all my life to the INDIVIDUAL way of judging others. I have never gone for the *all* idea other than my ALL ILLEGALS need to be deported or ALL child molesters need to be put to death. That is against ALL who are guilty of those things – not any given race, religion, gender.

    Thanks for the great words – and so glad you are back –

  8. Winston
    Winston March 17, 2010 12:21 pm

    I think our society does pretty good against racism considering our history, Most who disagree with that are trying to keep up membership in some exclusive collectivist organization.

    I’ve lived out in the country with rednecks all my life and could count on one hand the rednecks I have met who were geniune racists. Some folks tell black jokes and will go off on the “dey be takin are jobs!1!!!” thing now and then but real honest to gods racial bigotry is very very rare among country folk in my experience.

  9. Kirsten
    Kirsten March 26, 2010 6:20 pm

    Jackie, why exactly is it that “ALL ILLEGALS need to be deported”? Isn’t that just nationalist bigotry?

Leave a Reply