{"id":30590,"date":"2017-04-26T19:18:54","date_gmt":"2017-04-27T02:18:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/?p=30590"},"modified":"2017-04-26T19:46:08","modified_gmt":"2017-04-27T02:46:08","slug":"when-doing-the-right-thing-is-a-crime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/2017\/04\/26\/when-doing-the-right-thing-is-a-crime\/","title":{"rendered":"When doing the right thing is a crime"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There was a time &#8212; long ago now &#8212; when this theoretical situation would have been an interesting dilemma worth holding a long discussion over: You&#8217;re in a position where doing a good deed involves breaking a multitude of laws. What do you do?<\/p>\n<p>Back in the day, &#8220;breaking a multitude of laws&#8221; would likely have meant you were breaking laws <em>against doing harm<\/em>. So you&#8217;d have to balance not only possible penalties of lawbreaking but also the chance of doing bad to one party while trying to do good elsewhere. <\/p>\n<p>Now? It&#8217;s not even worth talking about. Laws are nearly all <em>mala prohibita<\/em>, created for the sole purpose of giving one group power over a less politically influential group. Other than the risk of getting caught, who gives a damn? <\/p>\n<p>A year or so ago I was in a position where doing the right thing, possibly even the lifesaving thing, meant breaking I don&#8217;t even know how many state and federal laws. Not one person anywhere would have been harmed by the lawbreaking. But an individual could have been harmed, and IMHO a friendship betrayed, by hewing to the damn stupid laws. <\/p>\n<p>It was a no-brainer &#8212; nothing more than a matter of deciding to exceed the standard American citizen&#8217;s quota of <a href=\"https:\/\/fee.org\/articles\/three-felonies-a-day-how-the-feds-target-the-innocent\/\" target=\"_blank\">three felonies a day<\/a>. Ho hum.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll bet every one of us has been in a similar situation. And we&#8217;ve all known what to do when it really mattered &#8212; when something personal to us or crucial to our friends was at stake.<\/p>\n<p>As El Neil said so eloquently, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.azquotes.com\/quote\/687647\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Of course I&#8217;m above the law. And so are you.&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>So now the only real debate is whether it&#8217;s a <em>bad<\/em> thing or a <em>good<\/em> thing for our culture (society, freedom, tradition, civilization, whatever) that we multi-felonious Americans routinely hold law in such contempt. <\/p>\n<p>Or perhaps it&#8217;s better to say &#8220;hold law in such disregard.&#8221; Because unless the penalties and\/or the chances of getting caught are unusually formidable, I really don&#8217;t believe I know a single person any more &#8212; including Sunday school teachers, scout leaders, retired old ladies, librarians, and hyper-honorable businesspeople, political or non-political &#8212; who considers the law to be any more than a mild annoyance. <\/p>\n<p>We do the right thing <em>because it&#8217;s the right thing<\/em>. Or because we want people around us to respect us. Because we have a moral center or a place in society that we want to keep. Sometimes that puts us on the right side of the law, sometimes on the left side of the law. But I&#8217;d never say the &#8220;wrong&#8221; side of the law, because law is so completely disconnected from concepts of right and wrong. And everybody knows it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There was a time &#8212; long ago now &#8212; when this theoretical situation would have been an interesting dilemma worth holding a long discussion over: You&#8217;re in a position where doing a good deed involves breaking a multitude of laws. What do you do? Back in the day, &#8220;breaking a multitude of laws&#8221; would likely have meant you were breaking laws against doing harm. So you&#8217;d have to balance not only possible penalties of lawbreaking but also the chance of doing bad to one party while trying to do good elsewhere. Now? It&#8217;s not even worth talking about. Laws are&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/2017\/04\/26\/when-doing-the-right-thing-is-a-crime\/\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">When doing the right thing is a crime<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,23,30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-government","category-thuggery-and-bad-law","category-resistance","ratio-natural","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30590"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30590\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30597,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30590\/revisions\/30597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}