{"id":397,"date":"2010-02-16T01:13:53","date_gmt":"2010-02-16T08:13:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/ClaireWolfe\/?p=397"},"modified":"2010-02-16T01:13:53","modified_gmt":"2010-02-16T08:13:53","slug":"comfort-with-complexity-iii-the-simplicity-on-the-other-side-of-complexity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/2010\/02\/16\/comfort-with-complexity-iii-the-simplicity-on-the-other-side-of-complexity\/","title":{"rendered":"Comfort with complexity, III: Simplicity lies beyond"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;I would not give a fig for the simplicity this side of complexity, but I would give my life for the simplicity on the other side of complexity.&#8221; &#8212; Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Life is so complex that government efforts to regulate and control it are doomed to fail, just as the Austrians say. And life is simple in the principles we use to guide us.&#8221; &#8212; Paul Bonneau<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/ClaireWolfe\/2010\/02\/10\/288\/\" target=\"_blank\">Part I here.<\/a> <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/ClaireWolfe\/2010\/02\/11\/comfort-with-complexity-ii-labels\/\" target=\"_blank\">Part II here.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Now we&#8217;re at the final installment, and reading Paul Bonneau&#8217;s comment above, I wonder if maybe I should just leave it at what he said and shut up. He summed up the political and philosophical aspects very well. <\/p>\n<p>But &#8230; there&#8217;s more. Of course. And (no surprise) it&#8217;s both simple and complex.<\/p>\n<p><b>When simplicity strikes<\/b><\/p>\n<p>You&#8217;ve probably heard the account of mathematician Henri Poincare&#8217;s sudden insight. As he stepped onto a bus, in the midst of a conversation with a companion, he was struck by a Great Truth about a subject he&#8217;d been pondering. He went right on with his conversation as if nothing had happened, but his whole life was changed. A complex problem had become simple.<\/p>\n<p>Not many people remember the subject of Poincare&#8217;s insight (non-Euclidian geometry), but lots of people know <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceblogs.com\/cortex\/2008\/07\/big_brain_little_brain.php\" target=\"_blank\">the story<\/a>. It has a universal appeal. <\/p>\n<p>Similar experiences abound. After years of dogged effort by some of the world&#8217;s most brilliant minds to discover the structure of DNA, young James Watson <a href=\"http:\/\/www.genomenewsnetwork.org\/resources\/timeline\/1953_Crick_Watson.php\" target=\"_blank\">has a sudden flash of clarity<\/a>: DNA is like a spiral staircase with two rails.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/St._Francis_of_Assissi\" target=\"_blank\">Saint Francis of Assisi<\/a> struggled for years, trying and largely failing to accomplish heroic works for God. Then one day, sitting in a dilapidated church, he heard the voice of Christ (so he perceived) telling him, &#8220;Francis, Francis, go and repair My house which, as you can see, is falling into ruins.&#8221; And he began at last to comprehend his life&#8217;s work. <\/p>\n<p>How many times have you had similar, if less saintly, experiences? You wrestle with some seemingly insolvable problem. For ages you get nowhere and feel as if you never will. Then one day you wake up &#8212; or you hear the lyric of a song &#8212; or you&#8217;re washing dishes &#8212; and suddenly, everything is clear. The solution is so obvious you wonder how you could have missed it. <\/p>\n<p>Mathematicians call the the truest solutions &#8220;elegant.&#8221; That&#8217;s just another way of saying that the best solutions take a complex reality and reduce it to simple lucidity. &#8220;E=mc2.&#8221;  Classic example.<\/p>\n<p>The truest insights  have a history of striking in the same way:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>You struggle and ponder and work.\n<li>You come to feel as if you&#8217;re beating your head on a wall.\n<li>You let go (go to sleep, listen to music, take a walk, have a drink or a smoke, etc.)\n<li>And in some moment of unawareness &#8212; wham. Simplicity strikes.\n<\/ul>\n<p>That&#8217;s what Oliver Wendell Holmes meant by his elegant quote at the top of this article. Simplicity achieved after thoughtful effort nearly always yields high truth. It may not be universal truth, as in a mathematical principle, but it&#8217;s truth for the seeker: &#8220;What is the right course for me to take?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a reward &#8212; and a glorious one &#8212; for brain-bending labor.<\/p>\n<p>Conversely, Holmes&#8217;s &#8220;simplicity this side of complexity&#8221; is mere illusion. Cheap. Easy. Sleazy. It&#8217;s a false simplicity pasted over complex truth. Its sole purpose (as Kevin Wilmeth pointed out) is to enable people to quit thinking and take comfort in a slogan or a fixed perception. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They hate us for our freedom.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Global warming is settled science.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Respect the office, if not the man.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Our leaders have better information than we do.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;My country, right or wrong.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Drugs are bad.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Cops and soldiers are all heroes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;All cops are pigs.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Change you can believe in.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Government supremacists argue: &#8220;The world is too complex to allow millions of individuals to make their own haphazard decisions about things; only by [national] [global] coordination can we save [the world] [the economy] [the children] [etc.]&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But those who argue <i>that kind<\/i> of complexity are actually advocating simplicity &#8212; <i>of the wrong kind<\/i>: &#8220;Don&#8217;t think. We&#8217;ll take care of you.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the &#8220;simplicity this side of complexity.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p><b>And then to act<\/b><\/p>\n<p>The simplicity on the other side of complexity &#8212; the simplicity that strikes so cleanly after honest struggle &#8212; is a blessing. Not only because it brings clarity to troubled thoughts and relief to troubled spirits. Not only because it so amazingly often yields real truths. But because it spurs us to action.<\/p>\n<p>Simplicity after complexity is a gift &#8212; but one that comes with a price: We now have to <i>do<\/i> something with our new insight. Conduct further research. Reform our habits. Change our job. Admit that our opinions have altered. Confront a skeptical world with a new truth &#8212; but <i>do<\/i> something. (Which may also mean <i>ceasing<\/i> to do something: quit drinking, stop voting for the lesser of two evils, take more time off work, leave a cult, stop advocating something we once believed in, cease putting up with abuse, etc.)<\/p>\n<p>In the immediate aftermath of a &#8220;simplicity strike&#8221; we might be eager to plunge ahead. But eventually, we&#8217;re going to discover further complexities, not in our new concept, but in the execution. And sometimes we might discover that, great as the simple insight was, the insight itself or our interpretation of it might be faulty. <\/p>\n<p>Which means we need to plunge into complexity once again and hope to come out with new simplicity on some further shore. Sigh.<\/p>\n<p>Poor St. Francis, for example. When he heard Jesus tell him to &#8220;repair My house,&#8221; he really thought he was supposed to go around repairing crumbling buildings. That&#8217;s what he did, at first. And he would have liked to spend the rest of his life in such simple labors. But his labors and his simple goodness eventually brought him brothers, and later brought a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/St._Clare_of_Assisi\" target=\"_blank\">young lady named Clare<\/a>, who brought sisters. All those brothers and sisters finally led Francis to his real mission, which wasn&#8217;t to &#8220;re-form&#8221; church buildings, but to reform the Church.<\/p>\n<p>And that got complicated. And wasn&#8217;t notably successful.<\/p>\n<p>And so it goes. Yet if Francis hadn&#8217;t sought his saintly clarities &#8212; had he taken the easy course and remained wealthy playboy Francesco Bernardone &#8212; history would merely have eaten his bones. Instead, he&#8217;s revered 800 years later by people of many religions or no religion at all. Not for what he did, but for who he became.<\/p>\n<p>And so it goes today with people seeking freedom in an unfree world. We may fail, but each time we confront a complexity and rise to a new simplicity, we gain. Even if the outside world gets worse, <i>we<\/i> become our better selves.<\/p>\n<p>The older I get, the more I see that all of life (by which I mean the real guts of life, the Big Things) is a series of complexities, solved by simplicities, which lead to further complexities, which lead &#8212; if we give our full hearts and minds to them &#8212; to further simplicities. <\/p>\n<p>Sometimes it feels like going round and round, up and down, on the same old merry-go-round. Without a doubt, the &#8220;simplicity this side of complexity&#8221; is a lot easier, for those who can stomach its comforting falsehoods.<\/p>\n<p>Yet the eventual result of complexities honestly faced and simplicities gratefully received and acted upon is &#8230; well, it&#8217;s something Oliver Wendell Holmes also expressed pretty well: &#8220;Every now and then a man&#8217;s mind is stretched by a new idea or sensation, and never shrinks back to its former dimensions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Each simplicity achieved is higher and greater than the last. We grow until we die.<\/p>\n<p>And if life has any point at all, <i>that<\/i> is it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;I would not give a fig for the simplicity this side of complexity, but I would give my life for the simplicity on the other side of complexity.&#8221; &#8212; Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. &#8220;Life is so complex that government efforts to regulate and control it are doomed to fail, just as the Austrians say. And life is simple in the principles we use to guide us.&#8221; &#8212; Paul Bonneau &#8212;&#8211; Part I here. Part II here. Now we&#8217;re at the final installment, and reading Paul Bonneau&#8217;s comment above, I wonder if maybe I should just leave it at what he&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/2010\/02\/16\/comfort-with-complexity-iii-the-simplicity-on-the-other-side-of-complexity\/\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Comfort with complexity, III: Simplicity lies beyond<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-mind-and-spirit","ratio-natural","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=397"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}