{"id":44216,"date":"2021-09-28T03:45:32","date_gmt":"2021-09-28T10:45:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/?p=44216"},"modified":"2021-09-28T15:50:14","modified_gmt":"2021-09-28T22:50:14","slug":"our-job-part-ii-b-cracks-and-opportunities-in-the-medical-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/2021\/09\/28\/our-job-part-ii-b-cracks-and-opportunities-in-the-medical-system\/","title":{"rendered":"Our job, part II-b: Cracks and opportunities in the medical system"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Note: I would be very glad to have experienced health-care workers jump into comments with any additions, corrections (however savage), reality checks, bright ideas, personal insights, or other forms of enlightenment.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8211;<br \/>\nOne thing about the hardest systems to route around: Being HARD, lacking flexibility, they develop a lot of cracks.<\/p>\n<p>Take a look at any heavily institutionalized or subsidized medical system. I\u2019ll use the U.S. system because the U.S. is home-not-so-sweet-home. But despite the claims that various socialized systems (e.g. Canada\u2019s and the UK\u2019s) are inherently better, many of the same or equally awful drawbacks apply to them.<\/p>\n<p>We glance at our medical system and we see: institutional and bureaucratic coldness; incomprehensible billing; insane costs; opacity; ghastly amounts of malpractice; treatments that seem healthier for doctors\u2019 pockets than for us; rushed and impersonal appointments; ignorance of nutrition; emphasis on sickness rather than maintaining health; doctors who sneer at us if we want a voice in managing our own care; data gathering; in short a system where the patient\u2019s needs seem to come last. And now this already broken system has gone to a centralized command-and-control model (run by bureaucrats who haven\u2019t tended patients in decades, if ever) and is either trying to force experimental vaccines on the unwilling, refuse services to the unvaccinated, or get rid of up to 1\/3 of its own workforce in the cause of a global moral panic.<\/p>\n<p>Wow. That\u2019s bad. And it\u2019s all true. To be fair, we also have to credit the system for huge advances in pharmacology, medical technology, surgical techniques, and much more. No doubt about it, modern medicine has produced lifesaving and life-enhancing wonders. But we wonder why such astounding advances have to come at such a human cost.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>That negative description above is only what the medical system looks like to our jaundiced eyes. It&#8217;s really just one <em>aspect<\/em> of a more vast and varied realm.<\/p>\n<p>Come closer. See the cracks in what looks like an immovable monolith.<\/p>\n<p>How many of you, without setting foot in a hospital or clinic, without seeing an M.D. or a nurse practitioner: take herbal supplements (in an industry survey, 77% <a href=\u201dhttps:\/\/www.crnusa.org\/newsroom\/dietary-supplement-use-reaches-all-time-high\u201d target=\u201d_blank\u201d>report they do<\/a>, and even the National Center for Health Statistics <a href=\u201dhttps:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/nchs\/products\/databriefs\/db399.htm\u201d target=\u201d_blank\u201d>says 57.6% do<\/a>); do bodywork; have hypnosis sessions; use biofeedback; practice tai chi; get chiropractic care; see an accupuncturist; explore traditional Chinese medicine; follow a diet customized to your specific health needs; utilize a float tank; use a TENS stimulator; get massages; perform homegrown physical therapy routines; meditate; or conduct any other type of body or body-mind-spirit practice for your own health and well-being?<\/p>\n<p>A lot of you. In growing numbers. <\/p>\n<p>These are cracks in the system. Ask yourself: how do we widen them to let in more freedom, more choice, greater possibilities of new discoveries in treatment and health maintenance?<\/p>\n<p>How many of you (before COVID travel restrictions, alas) either took a trip for medical tourism or considered doing so \u2013 that is, going to Mexico or Panama or India or Thailand or elsewhere to have medical care from skilled (and frequently U.S.-trained) doctors at a fraction of the price for the same procedures here?<\/p>\n<p>Cracks in the system. How do we widen them?<\/p>\n<p>How many of you have ever ordered prescription drugs \u2013 with our without a prescription \u2013 from offshore pharmacies?<\/p>\n<p>Cracks in the system. How do we widen them?<\/p>\n<p>Ever arranged your own blood draw and customized testing to monitor your own health at one of the growing number of independent labs?<\/p>\n<p>Cracks in the system. How do we widen them?<\/p>\n<p>How many of you have ever received some type of ad hoc medical service from a friend who is a nurse, a veterinarian, a retired doctor, or a medical student? How many of you have bartered for such services or gotten them free out of friendship or for past favors granted?<\/p>\n<p>Cracks in the system. How do we widen them?<\/p>\n<p>Ever hear about anybody who got a 3D-printed prosthetic for a few hundred dollars or for free rather than having to have one prescribed and pay phenomenal big bucks for it?<\/p>\n<p>Cracks in the system. How do we widen them?<\/p>\n<p>Already, just going by what we already have available to us &#8212; legally, quasi-legally, or illegally \u2013 we personally experience a health care system that is far less monolithic than we imagine.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes,\u201d someone objects, \u201cBut your accupuncturist can\u2019t remove your spleen and your neighborhood nurse can\u2019t irradiate your tumor and an ambulance shouldn\u2019t rush you from the site of a car accident to your friendly local veterinarian.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And that\u2019s true, too. There will always be a need for seriously interventionary care and emergency care, and and bless it, that happens to be what our present medical system is actually very good at. Now, if it were tamed, if it were recognized as merely one useful, but not all-encompassing, part of a varied and complementary health care realm, how much the better. If the medical system as a whole allowed for more individual freedom and choice &#8212; with less cosmically terrible and unpredictable costs &#8212; well, we&#8217;d really have something.<\/p>\n<p>And in realizing that we need to route around a system that is so clearly broken (even as it remains tremendously useful), we freedomistas have a chance to help create that more varied and more customer-friendly realm.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, we have the ability to diminish the old system\u2019s importance (and even perhaps some of its arrogance) by taking much of our everyday health management and a considerable bit of our treatment of common problems outside of it.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>Besides, the biggest cracks in the system are still ahead of us.<\/p>\n<p>Not very far ahead of us, it appears.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s going to happen when already burnt-out doctors and nurses drop out (or get kicked out) even faster when forced to take experimental treatments as a condition of working in large facilities?<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re likely to see more concierge practices (patient paid and patient centered), more small (even part-time) practices going against the trend of large corporations centralizing everything, more care offered at market prices by practitioners avoiding the entanglements of insurance. Watch for potentially more creative developments, more blurring of lines between what used to be called \u201calternative\u201d medicine and \u201cconventional\u201d medicine. (Listen for the terms functional, integrative, complementary, or holistic.)<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ll likely see more surgical centers independent of conventional hospitals. More doc-in-the-boxes with more sophisticated diagnostic and treatment equipment. More MRIs and CT scans offered  for a few hundred dollars, prices openly posted, rather than unknown thousands. <\/p>\n<p>And all this simply with available resources \u2013 and lots of doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners, physicians assistants and other professionals dropping or being kicked out, then dropping in to make it all happen.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, what are some of our most urgent needs as we consider how to create alternative health systems?<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A free market that makes most health care affordable to people of ordinary means\n<li>Transparency and competition in medical pricing\n<li>Practitioners that are both competent and willing to work with us on maintenance of our own bodies\n<li>Market-based, market-choice insurance for major medical needs\n<\/ul>\n<p>Some of this \u2013 the market-based insurance for instance \u2013 we can\u2019t easily get without moving the government\/insurance industry monolith, and that we can\u2019t directly do. But much else will be provided by people who\u2019ve dropped out of the system but, not wanting to starve or retire, will seek to create and build alternatives. <\/p>\n<p>Some developments may be revolutionary; most will be evolutionary. But even those may go in unexpected directions as medical professionals and patients meet each other on more personal terms.<\/p>\n<p>The existing system doesn\u2019t need to be toppled \u2013 yet. And probably never.<\/p>\n<p>It just needs to be made less central \u2013 and less centralized. Less all-consuming of everyone\u2019s resources. Less controlled by government and other institutional entities. Less viewed as THE only option.<\/p>\n<p>Are there risks? Heavens, yes! <\/p>\n<p>Some risks fall mainly on the patients, who might have their wallets and their trust pillaged by either untested treatments or outright cons. (But then, the wallet pillaging and faulty treatments are already realities.)<\/p>\n<p>More risks fall to the pioneering practitioners than to the rest of us. Those who let their government licenses lapse or who offer services a little <em>too<\/em> unconventional or who advertise in unapproved ways or who otherwise step on regulatory toes could face penalties from civil through criminal. They could have their reputations dragged through the mud, their practices raided and shut down, their patient records stolen, their finances pillaged, their credentials pulled \u2013 you name it. Central authorities <em>do not like<\/em> those who step out of their control.<\/p>\n<p>I believe we\u2019re coming up on a time when much more will slip out of governmental control. In the long run \u2013 good. In the short run, there\u2019s nothing nastier than a government terrified of losing its grip.<\/p>\n<p>But the good and great news is that even in a seemingly monolithic system like the government-insurance-corporate-medical alliance, there are already thousands of cracks. And the more rigid and entrenched the system becomes, the more opportunities we have for change.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Finally, a note about my personal views \u2013 and the views of a couple other smart people who\u2019ve had more contact with the health-care professions than I.<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve always tended to consider \u201calternative medicine\u201d in general as a whole bunch of woo woo. I\u2019ve turned to it only for specific purposes that conventional medicine simply isn\u2019t very good at. I\u2019m certainly not endorsing any particular alternative, or the entire concept of alternative medicine, over standard medicine. I merely look forward to the day when medical minds will be more open to protecting health as well as treating sickness, to considering that human beings are mind and spirit, as well as body, to using science as an effective tool while realizing it\u2019s not the only tool for healing. AND when far, far less of this will be controlled by central authorities in either government or industry.<\/p>\n<p>In researching this blog, I ran into a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.painscience.com\/articles\/alternative-to-what.php\" target=\"_blank\">thoughtful article by Paul Ingraham<\/a>, a former massage therapist who now looks upon alternative medicine with a jaundiced eye. But he still envisions what a productive partnership between conventional and alternative medicine <em>might have been<\/em>. His skeptic\u2019s voice is well worth hearing.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, I know an extremely rational person, a scientist, a multiple degree holder from one of the country\u2019s top STEM universities, who knows very well how to spot a con or a fraud or simply a faulty dataset when he sees one. But when he got a slow-growing cancer 15 years ago, he didn\u2019t hand himself over to experts. He researched and chose what worked for him, conventional and otherwise. He\u2019s now in the best health of his life despite still having cancer. Along his way he tells me that, though he kept his commitment to the scientific method and to sound, data-based decisions, he also took leaps of faith, and saw what he can describe only as miracles among other cancer explorers he networked with.<\/p>\n<p>So I advocate nothing \u2013 except us all having the freedom to seek (or develop) the treatments and the methods we want on the terms we find acceptable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Note: I would be very glad to have experienced health-care workers jump into comments with any additions, corrections (however savage), reality checks, bright ideas, personal insights, or other forms of enlightenment. &#8212;&#8211; One thing about the hardest systems to route around: Being HARD, lacking flexibility, they develop a lot of cracks. Take a look at any heavily institutionalized or subsidized medical system. I\u2019ll use the U.S. system because the U.S. is home-not-so-sweet-home. But despite the claims that various socialized systems (e.g. Canada\u2019s and the UK\u2019s) are inherently better, many of the same or equally awful drawbacks apply to them. We&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/2021\/09\/28\/our-job-part-ii-b-cracks-and-opportunities-in-the-medical-system\/\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Our job, part II-b: Cracks and opportunities in the medical system<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,11,13,18,23,26,27,28,30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-speech","category-government","category-health-and-science","category-mind-and-spirit","category-thuggery-and-bad-law","category-practical-freedom","category-preparedness","category-privacy-and-self-ownership","category-resistance","ratio-natural","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44216"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44216\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44253,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44216\/revisions\/44253"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}