{"id":7439,"date":"2011-10-04T02:41:32","date_gmt":"2011-10-04T09:41:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.backwoodshome.com\/blogs\/ClaireWolfe\/?p=7439"},"modified":"2011-10-04T02:41:32","modified_gmt":"2011-10-04T09:41:32","slug":"a-small-case-of-government-working-for-the-people","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/04\/a-small-case-of-government-working-for-the-people\/","title":{"rendered":"A small case of government working &#8220;for the people&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A random thought: I mentioned the other day that I was switching from Comcast to CenturyLink for Internet. <\/p>\n<p>C&#8217;Link will be an Internet-only contract. The Comcast package included the first land-line I&#8217;ve had in years. Didn&#8217;t really want it, but it came with the deal. I opted for a non-published number, then signed on to the national &#8220;do not call&#8221; list. I knew that list was dubious, but since it has pretty much replaced the earlier and better private &#8220;do not calls,&#8221; I went ahead figuring it would at least be of some help.<\/p>\n<p>The catch is that the fedlaw governing the list specifically allows politicians, pollsters, and charities to continue calling anybody they please. And doesn&#8217;t allow the poor telephone owner to opt out.<\/p>\n<p>Help? Hardly. Putting my number on the &#8220;do not call&#8221; list was like signing up to be swarmed by nuisance-call locusts. Although I don&#8217;t answer any of those calls, their ringing blasts disrupt my days and evenings. I&#8217;ll be thoroughly glad to have the pesky land-line gone.<\/p>\n<p>But here&#8217;s one of those questions to ask anybody who still imagines that the fedgov serves &#8220;the people&#8221; rather than special interests. If you were designing a &#8220;do not call&#8221; list for people who really hate nuisance calls &#8212; would you assume that everyone requesting &#8220;do not call&#8221; really, really, really wants to go on hearing from political campaigns, fundraisers, and poll takers?<\/p>\n<p>Would you assume people requesting &#8220;do not call&#8221; wanted <i>so much<\/i> to hear from politicians, poll takers, and fundraisers that they wouldn&#8217;t even want to have any specific opt-out options? Not even the ability to ask those particular nuisances <i>please and pretty please<\/i> not to call, just as a courtesy, even if the request isn&#8217;t fedthug-enforceable?<\/p>\n<p>Nooooo, I didn&#8217;t think so.<\/p>\n<p>Okay, I grant you this is hardly the most pernicious manifestation of government &#8220;help.&#8221; After all, you can put your phone number on the &#8220;do not call&#8221; list and not be murdered by uniformed thugs, &#8220;taken out&#8221; by a predator drone, jailed, or asset forfeited. That&#8217;s something. But for the people &#8230;? Huh. That depends on <i>which<\/i> people you&#8217;re talking about. <\/p>\n<p>The worst have been government pollsters, federal and otherwise. My Beloved State &#8220;randomly selected&#8221; me to take part in a poll and their cloying robo-voice left messages almost daily for two weeks demanding that I go to some website and type in some code to acknowledge their persistence. You just know I&#8217;m going to do that, right?<\/p>\n<p>Ahhhhh, but as of last night the Vile Instrument of the Devil is GONE! (Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t mean the vile instrument aka government. Just the telephone. But that&#8217;s progress.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A random thought: I mentioned the other day that I was switching from Comcast to CenturyLink for Internet. C&#8217;Link will be an Internet-only contract. The Comcast package included the first land-line I&#8217;ve had in years. Didn&#8217;t really want it, but it came with the deal. I opted for a non-published number, then signed on to the national &#8220;do not call&#8221; list. I knew that list was dubious, but since it has pretty much replaced the earlier and better private &#8220;do not calls,&#8221; I went ahead figuring it would at least be of some help. The catch is that the fedlaw&#8230;<\/p>\n<div class=\"more-link-wrapper\"><a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/2011\/10\/04\/a-small-case-of-government-working-for-the-people\/\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">A small case of government working &#8220;for the people&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7439","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-government","category-privacy-and-self-ownership","ratio-natural","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7439","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7439"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7439\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7439"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.clairewolfe.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}