Press "Enter" to skip to content

Whatever happened to monkeywrenching?

I admire and shake my head at the brass-balled hackery of LulzSec and Anonymous. I think these guys are gloriously crazy and that they’re either going to save the world or get their asses ignominiously whupped. Or both.

For sure, they’re getting into the pit with the biggest and most ruthless of Big Dogs, breezily unaware that they’re likely to get their throats torn out.

The world needs people like that. It’s so good not to be one of them.

Watching them got me wondering: Whatever happened to the glorious and not-so-grand tradition of monkeywrenching? Sure, those guys of LulzSec are champion monkeywrenchers — high tech in choice of weapons, but traditionalists in spirit. Still … with governments at war with individuals all over the world, wouldn’t you expect all manner of monkeywrenches to be tossed into all manner of works in all manner of ways?

After all, the monkeywrench is the little guy’s weapon of personal guerrilla warfare. It doesn’t require an army or even a gun. You don’t have to have a team or expensive equipment. Just opportunity, will, and whatever tool might be at hand. You can monkeywrench on as small or large a scale as you wish, as violently or non-violently, with humor or with deadly seriousness. It’s been this way since the word “sabotage” was coined hundreds of years ago. While nobody’s quite sure of the etymology of that term, everybody agrees it has something to do with those very humble objects of very humble people — a peasant’s wooden shoes.

Similarly with the monkeywrench, which replaced the sabot as a tool for screwing up the works. What could be more commonplace?

Yet these days when you Google (or when you more privately StartingPage) “monkeywrenching,” what you find is pretty feeble.

There’s plenty about “ecotage” (with which monkeywrenching has been identified since the days of Edward Abbey and EarthFirst!). But even that info is getting pretty hoary, dating back decades. More commonly you’ll find flat-out misuses of the term. Like this account and this one — which are both perfectly charming tales but don’t have a lot to do with real monkeywrenching.

Wussy misuses. C’mon, guys. LulzSec and EarthFirst! (love ’em or hate ’em) mastered the monkeywrench. But a senator “monkeywrenching” Obama’s plans? Ohgimmeabreak.

The Web, bless its useless little soul, is also rife with pompous and humorless definitions of monkeywrenching. But seriously now, let’s not be so serious! Monkeywrenching at its best is neither pompous (being the tool of the little guy) nor humorless (requiring Outlaw panache, style, and flair).

And while every monkeywrencher will pick his own target or for her own reasons, there is no more diabolical machinery, no Rube Goldberg device more in need of sabotaging than the machinery of Authoritah. The machinery of domination. The machinery of “shut up peasants and let your betters do what’s best for you.”

And wow, is there a lot of that machinery around.

So … it’s time for some good, old-fashioned monkeywrench appreciation. Time to put the shoes, the wrenches, the superglue, and the Attitude back into the works. We don’t have to throw ourselves bodily into the Big Dog pit with the LulzSec guys, bless ’em. It can be done on the quiet and on any scale.

For inspiration, some of the wicked and humorous old Loompanics books are still around, along with their Paladin-published cousins on the related topic of getting even. (Which of course isn’t monkeywrenching. But in these days when people are too terrified to put real monkeywrenching ideas into print, you might have to come at these things indirectly.) There’s inspiration in culture jamming (of which cop jamming is a notable sub-field. Hey, politicians do it. TV stars do it. Politicians do it. Samual Adams and rowdy rebels did it Politicians … but I repeat myself.

The main thing is that, though all modern history, plenty of angry individuals have tossed their monkeywrenches — physical, verbal, electronic, and above all Attitudinal, into the works of those who would be their masters. I say let’s be traditionalists.

24 Comments

  1. Pat
    Pat June 21, 2011 4:47 pm

    Off-topic: What’s the difference in Start Page and Starting Page? They seem to open to the same page. Is one newer… have they changed their name… or what?

  2. Claire
    Claire June 21, 2011 4:54 pm

    Pat, StartPage is its very own search engine — privacy oriented, of course. StartingPage is a Google search with privacy features added. Yes, they do look alike and they’re from the same people. But they yield different results.

    I love StartPage and DuckDuckGo for privacy. But creepy though they may be, nobody makes a search as great as Google’s. So I find myself using StartingPage a lot.

  3. Pat
    Pat June 21, 2011 5:03 pm

    Start Page uses Google, now with privacy features also; I’m using it.

  4. Carl-Bear
    Carl-Bear June 21, 2011 6:27 pm

    Monkeywrenching… Ah, the memories. We ran some monkeywrenching articles at Doing Freedom! way back when, and inevitably got nasty feedback about how evil we were for advocating such offenses to the State. I couldn’t help but wonder why clowns like that were even reading DF!.

    I was, apparently, an evil, terroristic, cop-hating public enemy for publishing a piece about posting speed trap warnings. And the author was evidently a diabolical criminal mastermind in need of summary execution.

    Me? I was always figured that if the cops have to run a surprise speed trap, then maybe the drivers aren’t actually doing anything terribly dangerous.

  5. Carl-Bear
    Carl-Bear June 21, 2011 6:48 pm

    Regarding startpage vs. startingpage: Both domains appear to be owned by the same outfit (also ixquick.com), and both are Google enhanced search engines. Per the “details” notes on the respective pages:

    “Startpage offers you Web search results from Google in complete privacy!
    When you search with Startpage, we remove all identifying information from your query and submit it anonymously to Google ourselves. We get the results and return them to you in total privacy.”

    and

    “Startingpage offers you Web search results from Google in complete privacy!
    When you search with Startingpage, we remove all identifying information from your query and submit it anonymously to Google ourselves. We get the results and return them to you in total privacy.”

    As for Google’s quality, I had to stop using it for research of any politically charged subject. Too freaking biased. It became most obvious back when the “climategate” emails (actually a lot more than emails, including program source code). Within a couple of days, Google’s engine could “find” only a small fraction of the results that even good ol’ AltaVista could dig up (and “lost” around 65% of what it did report early on); and what Google did serve up tended to be slanted towards criticism and disavowals of the leak.

    It was no great surprise that Al Gore turned out to have close ties to Google (including his own claim that he “helped” Google fine tune their search engine).

    Note the similarities.

    Ixquick, despite a nearly identical page layout (the logo itself being the most obvious difference between the three) does not refer to Google. All three search engines have separate IP addresses.

  6. Carl-Bear
    Carl-Bear June 21, 2011 6:51 pm

    That’s weird: “Note the […] …IP addresses.” should be ahead of the Google digression.

  7. Claire
    Claire June 21, 2011 6:54 pm

    Pat — Then I must be behind the curve on my information! And if so I’m sorry to have misspoken. And Carl-Bear, thank you for the detailed correction.

    StartPage used to have its own search function, but apparently that’s changed. In fact, Startpage used to be simply the U.S. version of IXquick.

  8. Claire
    Claire June 21, 2011 6:57 pm

    Carl-Bear — Being an evil, terroristic, cop-hating public enemy seems to be a good thing, then.

  9. Carl-Bear
    Carl-Bear June 21, 2011 7:34 pm

    Doesn’t pay worth a damn, though. [grin]

  10. Claire
    Claire June 21, 2011 7:56 pm

    Carl-Bear — I’m familiar with occupations that don’t pay worth a damn. But think of the satisfaction!

  11. Kevin Wilmeth
    Kevin Wilmeth June 21, 2011 10:17 pm

    For several years now I’ve been using Scroogle’s (scroogle.org) Google search scraper, which operates as an anonymizing proxy agent the same way Carl-Bear describes Startpage above. I use it as a home page for Firefox; not only has it always been good to me, but they have a most amusing selection of Google-snark splashes! (Yes, it’s true, sometimes I just sit and hit “Refresh” a few times just to cheer myself up. Usually works! 🙂

  12. Matt
    Matt June 22, 2011 7:42 am

    Monkeywrenching has probably been a victim of the times. I’m sure it is on Napolitano’s list of terroristic activities, or will be soon. Since most state activities are bureaucratic in nature, the common person might not see opportunity to whack things with that monkeywrench. The best monkeywrenching right now is probably recording activities of police and local politicians for public scrutiny.

  13. MamaLiberty
    MamaLiberty June 22, 2011 7:42 am

    And sometimes it just backfires…

    Since I came here, I’ve gotten six different phone books each year and I always throw away five of them. They all came with an “opt out” provision last time, so I went to the website and elected to opt out of those five.

    Sure thing… Got letters from those phone book companies. Seems they are mailed via the USPS as “bulk mail” to this area and, therefore, nobody can opt out!

    In April I threw away five of them again. sigh

  14. Bob
    Bob June 22, 2011 9:14 am

    Claire…. good books on monkey wrenching? I’ve read Edward Abbey’s “the monkey wrench gang” and “Hayduke Lives”. anything else worth reading? My all time favorite short story is “Postage Due” by Carl-Bear on the Doing Freedom mirror.

  15. Scott
    Scott June 22, 2011 9:31 am

    Mamaliberty-I had a similar experience-six to eight phone books a year. I just gave them away-there are people who make their own paper and can use them,and some school art departments use them(that’s where mine went-I think). You could try the Mythbuster’s pull-two-phone-books-apart stunt(got tanks?). Seems sort of a shame just to toss them, but one a year is plenty. A coworker uses them for archery/pellet gun backstops..

  16. Claire
    Claire June 22, 2011 10:44 am

    Bob — Good question. I wish I had a better answer. I’ve read the same books and stories you have & I also really enjoyed “Postage Due.” (I had forgotten about it, though, and will find the link and post it soon if Carl-Bear or you don’t beat me to it.)

    The Loompanics and Paladin books I linked to in the blog entry are the best sources I know — but clearly it would take some mining to get the best ideas out of them. The Sniggle.net culture jamming and cop jamming links are the best I’ve seen online (and their creator, I’m delighted to say, visits here). Another reader who had a fine monkeywrenching site online years ago took his down as the U.S. political climate darkened.

    Even back in the day when people weren’t too terrified of government retaliation to write monkeywrenching books, the real hardcore ones were mostly specific to “ecotage.” You can still find those online, but they’re not much use except to people who hate logging or whatever.

    Now? I don’t know of anybody who would dare publish a really good monkeywrenching book. But boy, “George Hayduke’s” Paladin Press revenge books do contain some brilliantly wicked ideas. (And I must add that though I’ve never met Hayduke and don’t have any idea what his real-world name is, he and I corresponded briefly years ago, and he impressed me as a charming gentleman — something you’d never guess from the content of his books!)

  17. WillA2
    WillA2 June 22, 2011 10:51 am

    It’s kind of hard to figure where and when one should “monkeywrench” and where and when one shouldn’t. Seems nowadays there is much emphasis on going after the little guy.

    I do what I can (no details).

    On the phone books, if you have a fireplace, they make a lot of heat during the cold days of winter. You have to stir them around from time-to-time though.

  18. Claire
    Claire June 22, 2011 11:00 am

    Oh yeah. If anybody here knows of any great monkeywrenching books … post a link!

    I’m deliberately not posting a link to Dave Foreman’s “Eco-Defense” because it’s not a good, general purpose monkeywrench manual. But it’s out there.

    The wonderful thing about monkeywrenching, though, is that your own ideas and opportunities can produce actions no writer could ever dream up.

  19. MamaLiberty
    MamaLiberty June 23, 2011 2:01 pm

    Scott, I “throw them away” in the local paper/cardboard recycling bin. What they do with them I have no idea. 🙂 Can’t burn them in my airtight stove and I live surrounded by so many people with horses, Ellendra , that I have far better things to use if I wanted to grow mushrooms – thanks anyway.

    The phone book thing really isn’t “monkeywrenching at all, I guess – except in reverse! I determined to reduce waste and was completely thwarted by postal regulations and the fact that the publishers of these books are most likely subsidized somehow by taxpayers to distribute them that way.

    I’ll have to give this some deep thought. Not too many “monkeywrenching” opportunities in my little community. But I’ll be looking. 🙂

Leave a Reply