Press "Enter" to skip to content

Who needs the NSA when you have Google and AT&T?

After the recent revelations about DEA snooping, I guessed the NSA would have to be involved. Hm. Not necessarily. Not when you have AT&T at your right hand. (Via Sipsey Street.)

And how strange have things gotten — how very, very strange? — when you try to reach the Secretary of State and after gradually climbing the bureaucratic ladder, you end up getting a callback from Eric Schmidt’s girlfriend instead? Happened to Julian Assange. And does not appear to have been “an isolated incident.”

How much longer can this corrupt, rotten, secrecy-obsessed corporate-state UberGovernment center hold?

5 Comments

  1. Paul Bonneau
    Paul Bonneau September 3, 2013 6:48 am

    I like that poem, but this line irritates me:
    “Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world”

    It’s not anarchy that is the problem… of course he meant “chaos” but why didn’t he say it? I guess the poem was written when “anarchy” meant “bomb throwing”.

  2. Dave
    Dave September 3, 2013 10:18 am

    Paul: The bane of my political discussions is that every time I mention anarchy I have to define it, then explain it, then defend it, then continue with the matter at hand.

  3. Claire
    Claire September 3, 2013 11:53 am

    Re anarchy/anarchism — Same here. For years I continued using “libertarian” because people at least didn’t think “bomb thrower” when they heard the term (though they sometimes, for many years, thought “libertine” or “librarian,” sigh). I finally decided to hell with it and started calling myself an anarchist.

    I figure nobody’s going to think “bomb thrower” or “window smasher” when they see a silver-haired woman calling herself an anarchist.

  4. Dave
    Dave September 3, 2013 10:30 pm

    I still frequently use “libertarian,” or even “extreme libertarian,” depending on whom I’m talking to.

  5. Kyle Rearden
    Kyle Rearden September 8, 2013 1:29 pm

    Isn’t anarchism only a negation of politics, and thus not a bill of wares proposing how humans should arrange themselves politically?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *