… but we may be about to find out.
For days, news has been going around the alt-right that revelations are about to come out about the Clintons that are so far out there that every other Clinton scandal pales beside them. The accusations have been very specific and involved (among other things) child sex abuse on a large scale. But all this “news” had its origins in one unreliably sourced story on one website that nobody ever heard of before. So like a lot of people, I’ve been watching but skeptically.
Now Anonymous and WikiLeaks appear to be about to confirm the creepiest claims.
This could still be disinfo. This could still be some kind of giant political dirty trick. I don’t know.
I just know that after days of rumor, instead of the wild claims being debunked they seem to be coming closer to reality.
—–
I wonder why they waited so long to bring it out. Since the MSM won’t be showing it, there might not be much influence on what’s left of the “election” campaigns.
What makes anyone think that Clinton and her minions can be shamed or manipulated with this sort of thing? I wonder how many of the “voters” even care…
Oh, BTW… the large empty space below the “leave a reply” area is blank again… larger, but still blank. LOL
As I recall back in the 90’s there were some pretty unbelievable stories combing out of Arkansas. Over time we found out that they were mostly true. Now there are even more ubeleaveable stores floating around. I fear that they are true as the level of depravity practiced by the Hollywood insiders that we know about are all in for the Democrats. Birds of a feather do flock together.
Claire, I’ve been reading the rumblings about this, about Comey coming forward with the Huma/Carlos Danger laptop with HRC emails on it because he had a mutiny on his hands at the FBI, but also the video from Steve Pieczenik, claiming that the US intel community and others are mounting a counter-coup against the Clinton coup and the Obama administration:
https://youtu.be/ov5kvWSz5LM
We’re living in interesting times…
“I wonder why they waited so long to bring it out. Since the MSM won’t be showing it, there might not be much influence on what’s left of the “election” campaigns.”
I also suspect that even if the worst is true it comes too late to influence the election. But it seems their reasons for releasing it so late are understandable: the worst info came to them very late and the info is so damning that they had to allow time to set up protections for the leakers.
Again, that’s IF any of this is true. But as BillT says, virtually every awful thing ever said about the Clintons and their corrupt crowd has turned out to be accurate in the past.
“We’re living in interesting times…”
Ain’t that the truth, rochester_veteran? I’ve also heard rumors and speculation about the counter-coup. Certainly Comey wouldn’t have come out with his new investigation at the last minute unless he was under pressure from something more than angry underlings at the FBI. Somebody or something both forced his hand and offered protection against Comey being Arkancided.
The times could get even more interesting if the worst news proves true and people conclude that this is not only a “Clinton thing” but a level of corruption among the political and economic elite that goes deep beyond all imagining.
For days, news has been going around the alt-right that revelations are about to come out about the Clintons that are so far out there that every other Clinton scandal pales beside them.
Well, my “surprised” meter on the subject pegged a long time ago, and “repulsed” wasn’t far behind. OTOH, I’ve also lost count of the “This is the video that will end Hillary’s career” notices that ended up being nothing.
I wonder why they waited so long to bring it out.
Not just the MSM issue. From what I’ve seen, and heard on the interwebs, a record number of people have already v*ted.
I see the ads. Lights and sleeping bags. Maybe ML is just too far out in the boonies. 😉
“…a record number of people have already v*ted”
Yeah, what I meant by being “too late” to influence the election much. Can’t remember where, but some people are now clamoring to CHANGE their early vote.
But then, I wonder why anyone bothers with an “election date” if people can actually “vote” pretty much whenever… I guess next will come the after “election day” opportunity to change one’s vote. That ought to be fun and occupy the idiots for at least a month more. Illegal aliens rushing across the border so they can vote? And with all of the other KNOWN false and fraud “votes” being counted, what’s the point?
Of course, the whole thing is insane. Just very strange why more people can’t see that, I guess.
Think of the psychology of the newly wealthy: Increasing wealth raises your IQ above that of the common crowd. Think “arrogance”. The early years’ examples from the Texas oil patch showed this.
So, based on the known behavior of what might be called the “Clinton Crowd”, I find the accusations to be at least somewhat credible. IOW, I would not be at all surprised to learn that the alleged facts are indeed “true fact”.
Why vote?
It has long been said that American Liberty rests on 4 boxes.
Soap box,
Ballot box,
Jury Box,
And Cartridge Box, and that they ought to be used in that order.
New Media, via the Internet, is the replacement for the corner Soap Box, and has led to
lots of folks using the ballot box. Let’s see how this pans out before we get to the last one.
To be sure, you DO want to be sure that your Cartridge Box is fully loaded…….
Tom Knapp on WikiLeaks and the (already damning) John Podesta emails: http://thegarrisoncenter.org/archives/8257
Election comment I’ve liked best lately, from a friend: “I still think Clinton will win, even if nobody votes for her.”
Reading this was disturbing. If true, why wait so long to release the data? All data has a best before date. I think this data is past it’s prime and would it have been a lot more relevant prior to the debates. Why? Because a lot of folks have already voted and more have made their minds up. When one looks at the liberal left media and spin machine the question becomes: after they go to work on the proles how big will the anti Clinton wave really be?
One question I would like answered is who stands to gain the most from the release of this information at this late date? That would be a big clue to how the next six months are going to play out around the world.
We are living in some very Interesting times.
Why wait so long? If it was too early, Biden , Barney or another could step in as a replacement. Timing is everything. Interesting times indeed.
Having a little experience in politics over the years I have come to believe that last minute desperation campaign charges that can’t be responded to are pretty much last minute desperation campaign charges that can’t be responded to, sex charges against Hillary hold as much water with me as the sex charge against Trump raping underage sex slaves that are out there right now too, there was suppose to be a press conference that got cancelled last I heard.
We have two low life’s running for president and their campaigns reflect it IMHO.
Best that can be hoped for is to turn some fence-sitters into stay-homers.
The Clinton faithful would still vote for her even if she strangled a puppy on live TV.
Too true, that. And if she even tried to strangle a puppy on live TV, every MSM outlet would immediately cut to a soundbite of Trump saying something vulgar and sexist.
http://truepundit.com/breaking-comey-mandates-all-fbi-agents-report-to-d-c-offices-prep-for-raids-arrests-in-clinton-probes/
From WOG, may get interesting soon.
I just saw that the Enquirer and other check-out line rags are talking about the Pundit allegations.
I wonder if those readers vote?
“I still think Clinton will win, even if nobody votes for her.”
Heh. But if we assume for sake of discussion that that’s not quite true, or, more precisely, that the fraud will be less than an order of magnitude greater than in the past – which I think not unreasonable on structural and logistical grounds – and also make a few other assumptions (in decreasing order of plausibility):
— The only poll (if any) for which its accuracy matters is the one taken on Election Day;
— Clinton is a weaker candidate than Obama in 2012 and Trump a much stronger candidate than Romney in 2012 (note: here, ‘strong candidate’ means specifically a candidate’s ability to draw votes from those who do not routinely vote for the candidate’s party, and, critically, those who do not routinely vote);
— Those strength / weakness effects will operate more or less uniformly on the popular vote in all the states;
— Thus, Trump picks up the states which Romney won in 2012 plus the states Obama won by less than ten percentage points in 2012;
Trump gets (if I’ve matched all the shades of 2012 blue states to the popular vote margin color scale correctly) 347 electoral votes.
I am tired of explaining this, but people who flew on the Lolita Express to Epstein’s pedophile Island weren’t going there to have a picnic. They were going there to have sex with underaged boys and girls. If you believe anything else, you are daft. Furthermore, the US Attorney who put Epstein in jail, had at least a partial list of those who did fly there, including Bill Clinton, who went 27 times.
“Certainly Comey wouldn’t have come out with his new investigation at the last minute unless he was under pressure from something more than angry underlings at the FBI. Somebody or something both forced his hand and offered protection against Comey being Arkancided. ”
This is just a gut feeling, but I think someone he cares about was threatened when he was investigating HRC earlier. Now, that person is safe, leaving him free to do what he was trying to do the first time.
I have absolutely no proof of this, it’s just an impression I got comparing his previous behavior to his current actions.
So, if the FBI attempted to arrest Clinton, would her Secret Service detail have to try to stop them?