I gather from the lack of response when I mentioned the show that few around here are devotees of Downton Abbey, the great Masterpiece series that ran for six big-hit years before its creators decided gracefully to bow out.
In a way I’m not surprised at the lack of a Living Freedom Downton Abbey Rah Rah Fan Club. Outwardly Downton has nothing to do with freedom. It’s also a kitchen-and-drawing-room drama, offputting for you, my largely male readership. So I’m not saying everyone should just rush right out and binge-stream Downton Abbey until they’ve gained 50 pounds from all the popcorn.
I’m just sad more don’t like it.
Yes, it’s a melodrama. But it’s also quality drama-drama, with superb characters, authentic atmosphere, simmering class conflicts, and glimpses of history. One of the things it has is stop-you-in-your-tracks brilliant dialog, brilliantly played.
Example — and this is a spoiler, so skip this if you aim to enter the series virgin-pure of mind. Robert Crawley, the Earl of Grantham (perfectly played by Hugh Bonneville) is a decent man. A man of principle, dignity, and compassion. But he’s also very, very much a member of the old-order aristocracy. He knows what’s proper, and one thing that’s very much not proper as the series opens in 1912, is the classes mixing as equals.
That will change. The most abrupt change is his youngest daughter (Jessica Brown Findlay) announcing she’s going to marry the chauffeur. You can imagine the heads hitting the fainting couches (I exaggerate a little). You can imagine Lord Grantham’s thundering rage.
But both Lady Sybil and the chauffeur, Tom Branson (Allen Leech), are made of stern stuff. Both are committed social reformers. She wants to break out of ladylike confinement. He’s an Irish rebel with a communist’s disdain for social class. And he is every bit Lord Grantham’s equal in dignity and honor.
There is a scene where the young couple is about to leave England to be married after a week of family conflict. They’re scorned, disowned, and still nobody bends. As they begin their final walk away, unblessed, the Earl yields. He calls them back and tells Lady Sybil there will still be money for her and a welcome home.
Then he snaps his head toward Branson and states with steely calm, “If you mistreat her I will personally have you torn apart by wild dogs.”
Branson pulls himself up to his full height and nods, “I would expect no less.”
Isn’t that a wonderful piece of writing? With acting to do it full justice. The whole series sparkles with that level of dialog and drama.
Even though this is my second time through the series, I still find myself getting involved and talking to the characters: “Now don’t do that. You don’t want to do that …” Or telling Thomas the conniving footman or O’Brien his lady’s maid partner in crime, “Oh, you rotten scoundrel, you.”
But aside from being gripping drama (if still given to moments of deus ex melodrama for which you want to smack creator/writer Julian Fellowes upside his brilliant head; “Mr. Pamuk, anyone?” I say to you who’ve seen season one), it really is in a lot of ways about freedom. Or at least about the history of how freedom and prosperity ebb and flow. It’s about manners and mores, but occasionally runs a tad deeper than, say, Jane Austen. When it covers manners, you understand the values that lie beneath. Excepting the occasional villain, these people do have deep values.
It’s about how people at all levels meet the challenges of a shifting old order with history cracking under it. Then the arrival of a brave new world of votes for women, the collapse of ancient estates, jazz music, bold women beginning to hold good jobs, and young people occasionally “living in sin.”
It’s about how even if they can’t prevent their world from crumbling, they can choose how they behave in response.
To me, it says a lot that’s meant for us now. While we theoretically never had an aristocracy, we’re building one. We’re obviously going in the opposite direction of the Downton people, so it’s almost as if nothing would be relevant. But so much is shifting at the roots. Theirs and ours. These experiences of the Crawley family, their servants, and inhabitants of the local village seem at once about both past and future. And about history that’s superbly woven into terrific stories, magnificently played.
I think above all, it’s a poignant pleasure to watch characters rise to their own moral codes and strive to be good people even as the world moves under them.

There was, and to a certain extent still is, an expectation among the Nobility and Gentry that they should conduct themselves in certain clearly-defined ways. Noblesse oblige is a real thing, to a properly-raised aristocrat, and failure in this regard might not make one a criminal but it could certainly make the next sitting of Lords very socially uncomfortable. It was a paternalistic, even insulting view to take, but it was a far cry above what our modern American aristocracy lives by.
Being new to the field, they have no experience and no context. Being American, and therefore religiously devoted to the idea that it is perfectly possible to get something for nothing, they want all the trappings of aristocracy with none of the responsibilities- I can hardly imagine Eric and Donald Younger suiting up and riding off to join the family Regiment in some horrid trench in Flanders, or a Kerry mounting horse to charge Balaklava. Duelling? Generous anonymous gifts to charity? Endowing churches and public works from family money? Fuggeddaboudit.
I have no TV so I wouldn’t know Downton Abbey anyway.
But the closest America ever came to aristocracy was the “nouveau riche” – which was (and still is) a sham, a snobbish idea of what aristocracy is all about. A country determined to get away from the manners and mores, (im)morality and hypocrisy of its Mother Country is not going to ever tolerate a true “aristocracy” – as no doubt modern-day celebrities and academicians think of themselves. Dignity and honor are born of an aristocracy of the spirit, of the individual, not from one’s “station in life,” or insistence on class.
(“Dueling?” The closest we’ll come is the Cold War.)
England is the only country in the history of the world who could *still believe in* a monarchy as epitomized by Queen Elizabeth. All other monarchies are trying hard to bring their countries into the modern world. Luckily England has Prince Harry (who will probably never make King) who would do away with the monarchy if he could, and Prince William who will bring Britain into the real world someday – if the country or the world lasts that long.
“I have no TV so I wouldn’t know Downton Abbey anyway.”
Pat, I have no TV, either. Haven’t for decades. Anything I watch, I watch on DVD or occasionally stream on YouTube or Amazon (though I much prefer DVD).
“It was a paternalistic, even insulting view to take, but it was a far cry above what our modern American aristocracy lives by.”
Well said. Even when our American aristocracy does do something like put up money for do-gooding (e.g. Gates, Zuckerberg), they do it less with an intention of helping and more with an air of intending to manage the whole damned globe and ensuring the peasants do what they wish us to do. No doubt there’s a fine line between that and what the old aristocrats did. But still a line.
My wife is a big fan of Jane Austen, so naturally we watched most of Downtown Abbey. We both enjoyed it but it was a little to dramay for her, we ended up taking a pass on the final season. She said she just didn’t care to see what horrible disaster would happen to them this time. It is superbly well done and I may yet finish it at some point, as my tolerance for drama is higher.
Alan, I think your wife and you will be gratified to know that the final season wraped up the various character arcs in a very satisfying way. Very.
Can’t blame your wife for wanting to avoid any more disaster, though. Julian Fellowes sure did have a habit of visiting catastrophe on well-liked characters.
I don’t usually care much for drama of any kind- life already has too much drama for my tastes. But, sometimes I stick my toe into places I don’t expect to enjoy just to see what happens, so Downton Abbey is a possibility now that you’ve recommended it.
That was an excellent review of the series. You captured the gestalt of it very well.
I can’t disagree with anything you said. Superb writing, acting, costumes, accoutrements (the cars!), and I love the mansion itself (a real place, actually lived in by the owners). But I gave up on it after the 2nd season. It had degenerated from melodrama into soap opera, and I couldn’t take any more of it. My wife watched the rest of the series (although she might have skipped the last season, too; I’m not sure), but I couldn’t be bothered.
Actually, that seems to be my limit for most TV series. Ones with a great premise and good characters seem to run out of steam (and their writers out of ideas) after 2 or 3 years, at which point I either give up or keep watching out of habit and then wonder why I do. Game of Thrones has been an exception to that rule; it’s kept my interest throughout. And if there has ever been a show which is not about “freedom” that is certainly it!
Are there any zombies?
I watched and enjoyed the first few seasons but then mostly lost interest when it started seeming to be a high budget soap opera. I think the tipping point for me was when Anna was… you know (I don’t want to spoil anything) – but I thought it was a bit harsh to do that to such a likable character.
Just to say….we love it.
My wife watched Downton religiously, and I watched when I had time. It was good, as in well-done, and “good” in a way that most TV misses these days.
IMHO there are two plots for TV series, Dallas and Friends.
In Dallas everybody spends their lives stabbing each other in the back, except for one good-person ingénue. A major plot element tends to be how long she will remain innocent before she learns to backstab. Game of Thrones is the epitome of such. I got depressed, and quit reading the books, when they kept killing off every character I was interested in.
In Friends people fuss and fight and get mad at each other and misunderstand and screw up and such, but at the end of the day they’re there when others need them. As in your example of the Earl of Grantham. To me that’s much more enjoyable, and much more realistic. (Unlike reel life, the Dallas societies don’t last long in real life.) Downton Abbey fits that milieu.
It’s also what I write, which is probably why I’m not famous.
I sense certain … similarities … between worlds. Lady Carnarvon blogs and writes books. I think we need a Constitutional Amendment to repeal the Nobility Clause so Claire can have the Title she deserves. Let’s get the Monk on youtube. Every little bit helps when it comes to funding home repairs. Wouldn’t garden parties or afternoon tea at Mo Saoirse be delightful? 😉
Agreeing with laird, that was an excellent review of the series. Pretty sure I watched about a full season or so of the show way back when, and don’t really remember why I didn’t continue. But maybe another try is coming, given your words.
If I’m going to gain 50# binging on TV serials, it will be Breaking Bad.