The Wandering Monk has missed or miscommunicated about a couple of neighborhood appointments this week, so neighbor J. texted to see if I knew where and how he was. She added she thought she’d seen him on a bike, disappearing down an alley beside a certain building in town. Ninety-nine percent sure, she said, although we agreed that was highly unlikely.
Then today I went past that building, and there was the Monk’s doppelganger. Same lean build. Same angular features, same dark hair in a ponytail, same doo-rag around his forehead, similar face. Except that this was clearly the evil twin. Although I saw him only for seconds, his presence was very dark.
I later told J. about it and she joked that maybe he could come do construction when the Monk couldn’t be found. I offered to be her bodyguard. She said she’d greet him with her Rottweiler and his brothers.
Edgar Allen Poe could have written a story about the Monk and this guy. So weird J. and I discovering him in nearly the same spot on consecutive days. Maybe he lives in the neighborhood. I hope not.
This is a story the Monk has to hear, of course, though I suspect it will disturb his superstitions.
—–
This has been a week of seeing evil twins for me.
It’s been a week of seeing the evil twins of the Internet. All week I’ve experienced the kind of petty malice that the ‘Net so well facilitates.
That’s not the kind of world I inhabit. Not that I’m unaware what it’s like out there in the big ugly ‘Net. But I spend my online life isolated from it. I do my best to avoid it, and I’m fortunate enough to be surrounded by people who can argue with civility and support with good grace. There’s a minimum of name-calling, trollery, or enmity in this little world here, and I cherish that (as, I think, do most of you). Even when tempers get hot, people behave like decent human beings. We don’t take to petty online campaigns at each other.
Of course I know it’s out there. Commentariat members often point out some horrible comment thread on an otherwise good article, but I don’t see it because my JavaScript is turned off. I go to someplace like YouTube where the comments almost invariably read as if they’re written by dueling kindergarteners; I avoid comments because I can’t believe the world is that stupid. I don’t go to contentiously uncivilized places because I don’t enjoy them. And usually, thank heaven, they don’t come to me.
But this week I’ve seen a rash of … well, some of the ‘Net’s less pleasant, though hardly its worst. In some cases, I’m dealing with strangers or unknown trolls. In several cases, it’s been unpleasantness from someone I thought highly of. I’m like, who are these people? Did I ever know them or is there some way I could have missed this about them?
Why am I suddenly seeing all the evil twins?
Rhetorical question. I know why. It’s hardly even worth going into, it’s such a small business. Or ought to be.
Bottom line: I’ve craved a mental-health day since last weekend, and today I took one. Well, half of one. I shut down the computer (after asking the tech geniuses to be on the lookout for problems), and paid attention to the day.
It was warm and sunny after morning gloom. Ava and I went down to the water and sat watching fishing boats come in. Then time for two episodes of Downton Abbey (season three, whose ending moments I hate more than anything else in the series).
I tried to think about the future. I didn’t get very far with that, but I wound down. And was able to think of the good people again. The people who have something to say and say it with honorable argument instead of vulgar mudfights. The people who recognize that life exists outside of the hypnotic screen. The people who stand up for what they believe, support their friends (including, emphatically, me), keep things in proportion, and sometimes dazzle with great senses of humor or personal expertise offered with great generosity.
And the day was good.
Thanks for thinking of me. Haha. Love ya!
I have a doppelgänger that people who know me have spotted around town several times, when I was in a different place, usually at work. I’ve never met my doppelgänger though. I’ve also had people tell me I resemble Ted Nugent. I’m not quite sure how to take that…
I’ve been hearing “weren’t you here last week–you look just like him” most places I’ve worked since the seventies, through Alaska, Washington, and Oregon. Never met my double though, and it’s happening less these days.
And agreed, I mostly avoid comments, excepting here, and just a few similar sites. Why would anyone wish to speak like those others? But such nastiness does make less of what might otherwise be more useful channels of communication, which, perhaps, is largely the point. No reference links to offer this morning, but I’ve no doubt at all that our masters–military and otherwise–are paying thousands of lost souls to sit at computers and do pretty much that sort of thing.
And it’s spirit lightening reading of another’s nice day, thanks.
There are evil people out there for sure, the net let the evil be even more evil because of the lack of consequences.
I try not to be where they be, in real life or on the net, and when an evil viper shows it head in my younger days my first reaction was to take a shovel to it but today it is to watch them slither away unless they come towards me then that shovel is never far away.
However the last thing I now try to do with an evil viper is reason with it.
Yup, Comrade X, the net did let evil be more evil because of the lack of consequences. My friends and I from my web forum were messed with for several years by a nasty troll. We finally found out who he was and exposed him and he went away and stopped messing with us.
One cannot reason with evil sociopaths, I’ve learned that too in my old age.
Poe, or maybe Robert Louis Stevenson?
I once had someone tell me I looked like Captain Spaulding, a reference which I had to look up. Oy!
There’s a guy I hear on the radio sometimes, who sounds like Bill Paxton. So far, I have refrained from asking him to say, “Game over, man!” I suppose audio doppelgangers are easier than visual.
“Poe, or maybe Robert Louis Stevenson?”
Yeah, Stevenson. He already did it in a way, didn’t he?
And that guy really did creep me out. He was not merely a doppelganger, but clearly the EVIL twin.
“the net did let evil be more evil because of the lack of consequences.”
Yep. A great deal of evil lurks on the net. I don’t don’t consider what I’ve experienced this week to rise (or fall) to the level of evil. It’s been spiteful and unsavory, but on an entirely petty level. But the same lack of consequences that enables true evil also enables every sort of everyday nastiness.
Im sorry you have been there, too.
“I once had someone tell me I looked like Captain Spaulding, a reference which I had to look up. Oy!”
I had to look that up, too. Yikes!
I’ve never met you in person, jed. But I’d be pretty confident you don’t look a thing like Captain Spaulding. Except perhaps on Halloween.
Methinks I saw Captain Spaulding here once;
https://living-las-vegas.com/2017/01/clown-motel-scariest-place/
I believe the model was William Deacon Brodie. On a show I watched they said he was caught because one of his low life cohorts messed up. He swore he would never be executed and swallowed a section of pipe. He was kicking when let down and a doctor attended to him. The show also noted, as does this article, that his supposed grave was later opened and found to be empty. http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/rvp/pubaf/chronicle/v9/mr15/horror.html
I’ve heard the expression that you never really know someone until you divide an inheritance with them. I’ve found to my considerable displeasure there can be a similar analogy with a long time friend when big money becomes involved.
There was an original Star Trek episode (I can’t remember the name, but someone here will know it for sure) in which Kirk was transported to an alternate universe where all the characters were the opposite of what they were in the original universe. Spock was the only one who hadn’t really changed. He figured out what the problem was and fixed it.
> I’ve heard the expression that you never really know someone until you divide an inheritance with them.
Are you familiar with the writings of Shan Yu?
There was an original Star Trek episode (I can’t remember the name, but someone here will know it for sure) in which Kirk was transported to an alternate universe where all the characters were the opposite of what they were in the original universe. Spock was the only one who hadn’t really changed. He figured out what the problem was and fixed it.
Shel, that episode was titled, “Mirror, Mirror”:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0708438/
I’m not having any luck finding those writings, Jed. The only Shan Yu’s I’ve found so far are a Disney Character and this: http://hare.bio.miami.edu/hun/xiang.html
Thanks, RV. That’s definitely it.
Shan Yu is an in-joke for Firefly fans, Shel. And the line jed quoted was spoken by a villain while torturing one of Our Heroes.
Shan Yu was a (fictional) warrior-poet and great fan of cruelty who believed “…live with a man 40 years… share his house, his meals, speak on every subject … then tie him up and hold him over the volcano’s edge. On that day, you will finally meet the man.”
Sharing an inheritance is a slightly easier way to learn about somebody. Or seeing how they behave online.
> The only Shan Yu’s I’ve found so far are a Disney Character
Oh, wow. So Whedon borrowed from Disney? Obviously, I haven’t seen Mulan.
My question was, did you read that in Book’s or Niska’s voice.
The ‘Mirror, Mirror’ episode of Star Trek most definitely included an evil Spock. That’s the source of all the jokes about making someone evil by adding a goatee.
http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/community-sitcom/images/d/db/Spock-vs-evil-spock.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20120927150452
I don’t know anything about any of the characters, Whedon, Mulan, or Firefly.
Perhaps I was too young to understand Star Trek when it came out. Then again, perhaps not.