She didn’t learn from “basket of deplorables.”
She didn’t learn from losing a freaking election for which she was supposedly already coronated.
“If you look at the map of the United States, there’s all that red in the middle where Trump won,” Clinton said. “I win the coast, I win, you know, Illinois and Minnesota, places like that.”
Clinton suggested that the portion of the US she won represents portions of the country that are thriving economically.
“But what the map doesn’t show you, is that I won the places that represent two-thirds of America’s gross domestic product,” Clinton continued. “So I won the places that are optimistic, diverse, dynamic, moving forward. …
Yep, us Bubbas and Bubbettes out here in the worthless wastelands are just sitting around picking our noses, collecting our welfare bux, clinging to our you-know-whats, wallowing in laziness and stupidity, watching our teeth fall out, and plucking our banjos, while all the worthwhile people — you know, the ones with the artificially whitened teeth, the fancy wine cellars, and the large campaign contributions — are out there v*ting for Hillary.*
Gawd. Trump may be an impulsive, narcississtic eejit who wouldn’t understand a philosophical principle if it bit him on … erm, one of his Big Hands. But Hillary? Going around calling him and all his v*ters backward bigots? She’s the backwardest bigot of all.
Yeah. Go back to today’s links post and re-read Kurt Schlichter’s essay about who’s going to win that war, if (heaven forbid) it ever comes.
—–
* Yes, I live in a blue state. I also live in a deep red county. Which happens to be full of some of the best people I’ve ever met.
We have them surrounded where the only place they can retreat to they will be needing these;
https://www.ebay.com/p/Play-Day-Red-Starfish-Swim-Armbands-Water-Wings-Floaties-Inflatable-Set-of-2/1342082523?iid=232668327235
Let the woman stay stupid. It’ll keep her from being elected to anything at this point. And THAT, ladies and germs, is good for America!
Comrade X – kinda like lemmings, only close to the end of the journey, eh?
She has blamed everyone…
Except herself. I think she’s missing a bet there.
Hillary Who? Oh, yeah, her…
I love Dueling Banjos!
Despite all the negativities about Trump, one thing can be said, all this has been somewhat entertaining. Especially watching the Democrats have all those “conniption fits” about Trump. I think they’re even starting to show their true colors to the masses whereas we’ve seen them a long time ago.
Gee. I’m so old I can remember when the Democrats strongly spoke for the blue collar Joe Sixpack working man. Now? He’s a deplorable.
Maybe that’s why she lost three heavily-unionized states?
No, Hilary didn’t win Illinois. She won Chicago. Here are the results at county level:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2016/countymaprb1024.png
What she still doesn’t realize is that Trump didn’t beat her, she beat herself. Lots of people pulled the Donald lever because he was the second worst candidate.
If she thinks that what the folks in NYC and LA produce is more important than what the folks in Nebraska and Kansas produce, then she’s never been hungry.
You all know that I don’t “vote” at all, but I’m still completely puzzled by the fact that out of 320 some million people in this country, the “choice” was between two of the most seriously odious people I can imagine. And I’ve been around long enough to be able to imagine a lot of bad stuff happening.
It will be interesting to see, again out of that 320 million pool, which two utterly insane, evil and stupid people will be presented as the “candidates” for the next ruler.
“out of 320 some million people in this country, the “choice” was between two of the most seriously odious people I can imagine.”
I’ll second that. Back during the election I commented that the voters were being offered a choice between Boss Tweed and P.T. Barnum. I haven’t seen anything to make me change that evaluation.
Stop insulting Boss Tweed!
“It will be interesting to see, again out of that 320 million pool, which two utterly insane, evil and stupid people will be presented as the “candidates” for the next ruler.”
At one point when this blog was exploring some interesting new words, I came across the perfect description of the US government. It’s a pecksniffian kakistocracy.
Pecksniffian: hypocritically and unctuously affecting benevolence or high moral principles.
Kakistocracy: a system of government which is run by the worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous citizens.
I have yet to see any evidence that would contradict this description.
[…] Claire has more. […]