Press "Enter" to skip to content

Poverty vs poverty: Seven traits of the successful poor

It’s a mystery why one person can be poor but still be proud, independent, and reasonably content while the guy next door is only content to slide into a swamp of misery, blame, slovenliness, dependence, and cigarette smoke.

I agree that Alchemist summed things up pretty well by observing, “Poor is a state of finance. Poverty is a state of mind.”

But why?

Entire tomes have been written about poverty, of course. How soul-crushing it is. How it leads to crime. How it’s everybody’s fault except the individuals who are in that state. How it’s increasingly becoming institutionalized among entire classes.

I have no answers for that (and neither do the tome writers or the politicians who pimp poverty for power). Better to look at the “poor who aren’t impoverished,” the poor who don’t live in either mental or physical squalor.

How are they different?

Please feel free to chime in with thoughts of your own, but here are seven traits that make the difference between the poor and the squalid.

1. Some sense of choice.

Some of the most “successful” poor people I know have, in one way or another, chosen to be poor. Maybe they’ve done it on principle — for religious reasons, to avoid funding government, to pursue adventure, or because they believe in simplicity, for example.

But even people who’ve been rendered poor by disasters, theft, financial folly, or government abuse are better off when they can think, “Well, maybe I put myself here and maybe I didn’t. But in any case, I can now chose how to respond to the mess I’m in.”

2. Responsibility.

Which leads to the next trait. And this one goes almost without saying. Once you conceive you have choices, you then accept responsibility for making choices.

It’s funny that responsibility is always seen as onerous — some dreary, painful duty. Because it’s the outgrowth of choice. As Rush sang, “If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.” So better to choose freewill.

Accepting responsibility is accepting personal power. And isn’t that a great thing to have? Even if you got poor by being whacked upside the head by bad health, crime, untrustworthy companions, fire, earthquake, or accident, it feels better to be able to say, “I’m responsible for what I do now than it does to lay about and blame God, the government, Jews, your mother, the 1%, or an uncaring universe.

3. Creativity or spirituality.

Nearly every successful poor person I know is a person who “sees beyond.” Some are deeply spiritual while others are about as religious as rocks, but all have an innate knack for perceiving what others don’t perceive — and pursuing it.

That may mean something as grubby as seeing the possibilities and purposes in a heap of trash that a more prosperous person has dumped. On the other hand, it could be something as ethereal as “following the voice of God.” It may mean being able to create beauty, comfort, or great food with simple materials. But it always means looking within to find possibilities that others don’t see.

4. Support networks.

Friends. And not the kind you get from clicking “like” buttons.

Most successful poor people (even if they are dedicated introverts and hermits) have huge, reliable support networks. People they can share projects with. People who send them care packages. People who take the time to think of them. People who’ll be there in an emergency.

And just as important, despite all that they lack, they’re also the kind of person who’ll do the same, or the equivalent, for others.

5. A belief in lemonade.

Successful poor people aren’t necessarily optimists. But they understand that even the most terrible things can eventually turn out to have positive consequences. And by acknowledging the possibility of positive consequences, they help create them.

They know how to actively make the proverbial lemonade out of the bromidic lemons.

6. Frugality.

Successful poor people aren’t cheap or stingy. Cheapness and stinginess imply an unhealthy obsession with money and an ungenerous spirit. But they are frugal — and not only because circumstances force them to be.

They understand Grandma’s old maxim, “Use it up, wear it out, make it do or do without.” And they gain surprising satisfaction by applying their creativity to finding the best ways to make life better through Grandma’s rule.

7. Not thinking poor.

Obviously, being poor can be desperately stressful. It’s hell not to know where your next rent payment or next week’s groceries are coming from. It can be bitter seeing others casually acquiring things that are beyond your reach. It’s terrifying not knowing if medical bills will suddenly sweep away every tenuous bit of security you’ve been able to create.

Successful poor people acknowledge those realities and deal with them as best they can. Sometimes — many times! — they endure hair-raising moments or even hair-raising years.

But they don’t make those realities into the perpetual long-term realities of life. They … live. And ultimately, beyond the perils, find satisfaction in life.

—–

Your thoughts?

17 Comments

  1. LarryA
    LarryA August 4, 2014 3:56 pm

    Not sure how it works today, but c 1972 my wife and I attended the wedding of a couple of school friends. During the reception they announced they had both quit smoking, because what they were spending on cigarettes would make the payments on a nice new car.

    IMHO between #2 and #3 should be “Planning ahead.” No, the plans don’t always work, but they’re better than not having one. Ellendra’s refrigerator lady isn’t thinking past “I have no food today” to “How will I eat tomorrow?”

  2. Claire
    Claire August 4, 2014 4:46 pm

    EXCELLENT point, LarryA! I should’ve thought of that. Glad you did.

  3. naturegirl
    naturegirl August 4, 2014 6:26 pm

    Pride, dignity and character has to fall into play in there somewhere. The difference between the two is in self awareness and the way they feel about themselves and what little they do have left. Squalor starts showing up right after the person gives up, doesn’t care anymore, begins to feel defeated/overwhelmed by the circumstances (or by whatever happens “to” them.) And yes, they do stop looking ahead, become focused on only what is going on at the moment. The poor don’t become the squalid simply because of how they value themselves.

    I am convinced the most bitter, more resigned to this new way of life, are the ones on some type of government assistance. I grew up nearby the projects in Chicago and remember those vividly. It’s frightening now to see that same thing happening on a wider scale, all types of people who get mixed up in the system. It may not be a cluster of buildings anymore, it’s reaching farther now.

  4. Joel
    Joel August 4, 2014 6:26 pm

    This might fit in with #5, or maybe #7, maybe it’s just a different way of phrasing it, but I would add “learning to relax.” I used to call it embracing the chaos. A person without financial surpluses has, or can develop, surpluses of other sorts but he can only perceive them if he can relax to a new normal – which after a period of adjustment can turn out as good or even better than the old normal. But the first tendency is to panic.

    This sort of ties in with what LarryA said, as well. When a plan or a routine fails and you can’t just buy your way out of it, which is what most of us are trained to do whether we realize it or not, there’s always a period when you feel like you’re falling. The first instinct is to thrash around grasping for what isn’t there any more, but what you really need to be doing is deploying – or rapidly composing – Plan B. Plan B often proves flawed, but that’s fine: It’s a starting point and at least gets you working. Somewhere between Plan B(a) and B(z), you’ll find your new normal. But only if you’re working toward it.

  5. jack veggie
    jack veggie August 4, 2014 10:07 pm

    i’m not on the list of the most successful poor people but i’m living on about 1% of my top year as an attorney. a life that is about 99% better. and eating good too. and not contributing a dime to my oppressor government.

  6. Matt, another
    Matt, another August 5, 2014 7:26 am

    I have known people that would not eat foods they considered only fit for “poor” people. Staples like beans, rice, corn bread, ramen noodles, onion sandwiches, mystery meat etc. I feel sad for them. Some of the best meals I have eaten were with “poor” people. Beans, rice and cornbread scooped from cauldrons and platters and eaten while squatting on the ground is mighyt fine eats. Just ask them to define hot before eating the salsa.

    The hardest burden of responsibility for many people is haveing to admit to themselves that they made the problem they are faced with. Accepting that fact makes accepting the personnel power of responsibility a bit easier and a little less scary. Of course, the Govenrment, Religion and almost any “helping” organization really doesn’t want to many people accepting responsibility and helping themselves, bad for business.

  7. Pat
    Pat August 5, 2014 8:05 am

    Is the glass half-full or half-empty? I think that’s what drives the perception of “poverty”.

    Many people do not know what ”poor” means, either (nor does government). Too many people put a price ― and limit ― on what is rich or poor by comparing themselves to others, and always wanting more and better. The acquisition of “things” is rampant today. It’s why Amazon has grown so fast. It’s why some people look down on family members who live frugally, create hand-made gifts, and drive 10-year-old cars. It’s why government keeps upping the ante for its lower-income population (the minimum wage being a case in point).

  8. Guffaw
    Guffaw August 5, 2014 8:23 am

    I’m uncertain where this fits in, but GRATITUDE!
    I’m on disability, and have lost much in my life, including a wife and daughter. But GRATITUDE keeps me from despair.
    I lost my home due to lower income – a good friend took me in.
    I’m grateful for that!
    And many other things – when I remember to think of them!

    gfa

  9. MamaLiberty
    MamaLiberty August 5, 2014 9:12 am

    A resounding AMEN, Guffaw.

    My mother taught me early:

    I cried because I had no shoes… until I met a man who had no feet.

    My life has been 1000% better since I left the life of killer stress, even though it made me leave a beloved profession. That job had paid very well, but it was killing me! Taking responsibility for my inner self was life changing, even though I’d always considered myself a sovereign individual.

    And that change involved being grateful for everything, as much as possible. Gratitude for the rain and snow, instead of bitching about the weather. Gratitude for common, essential body functions that had not been either common or comfortable when I lived with stress and frustration instead. Gratitude for whatever I can get from my garden, or for the poop covered eggs my neighbor brings me sometimes. And so much more…

    Face each sunrise with gratitude, with JOY, and each sunset with a promise to do better tomorrow.

  10. Scott
    Scott August 5, 2014 9:54 am

    Mama LIberty stole most of my thunder. For a year or so, I didn’t have(couldn’t afford) a car-but I had a bicycle, and since I enjoy riding a bike, it wasn’t much of a deal. You see more from a bike, it’s good exercise, and you’d be surprised where you can go on a bike ( 8 inches of snow, rode near a waterspout on a bike once, in 45+ MPH winds/rain) and what you can carry (older VW engine) on one. I was grateful I was in good enough physical shape to ride, and the knowledge to maintain/modify the bike.
    A lot of my things came from Goodwill/yard sales/flea markets/surplus store and the like, but so? Those places are far more fun to visit than WalMart….

  11. Ellendra
    Ellendra August 5, 2014 10:05 pm

    My insomnia meds are kicking in, so this may not be coherent, but it seems that somewhere in there should be something about active vs. passive voice.

    Take the refridgerator lady (love the nickname). Her fridge broke down. Her rent came due. The money wasn’t there, because the restaurants charge so much. There is nothing in the house to cook. And none of this would be a problem if her ex-husband wasn’t such a lying, cheating a_hole, or if her live-in boyfriend would quit playing Xbox all day and get a job!

    Passive voice. She’s a bystander to her own life.

    There are people who deal with things, and there are people who things happen to. She sees herself as a person that things happen to.

    On the other hand, when I didn’t have a fridge, *I* (active voice) bought and cooked things that didn’t need a fridge. I don’t have irresponsible exes or boyfriends, because *I* (active voice) learned the warning signs and refused to allow such people into my love life. And believe me, there were plenty that tried!

    I think the successful poor are active participants in their own lives. The squalid see themselves as helpless observers. Both have “things” in their lives that need dealt with, but one sees themself as the person who needs to deal with it.

  12. mtp
    mtp August 6, 2014 8:13 am

    That’s a wonderful essay about dignity and humility and indomitable spirit.
    Thanks for the great sentiment Ms Wolfe.

  13. Claire
    Claire August 6, 2014 2:14 pm

    LarryA — I’ve been called many things, some of them even polite. But never “legendary.” I already wrote to Sheila to tell her that really, I have very little in common with people like the Lone Ranger or Conan the Barbarian.

    I do think Sheila is going to be a huge asset for JPFO and I’m thrilled she’s on board.

    Oh. And thanks for noticing — and embarrassing the heck out of me. 🙂

  14. Paul Bonneau
    Paul Bonneau August 6, 2014 7:02 pm

    I knew a couple of hippies with two kids who lived an unconventional life. We rented an old run-down farm to them for a while. While there were some stresses in their lives, I think they were pretty happy. It was amazing to me how little they could get by on. He scrounged stuff, they both were occasionally employed, they gardened, he would play an old guitar for his kids, etc. I admired them for not being locked into the “normal” high dollar existence. It was probably pretty close to how most rural people lived back in the 19th Century.

  15. LarryA
    LarryA August 7, 2014 7:35 am

    Lone Ranger or Conan the Barbarian

    I can see either of them vacationing in Hardyville, or when needed showing up in the nick of time.

    The thing about being a legend is that you don’t get to decide when you are.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *